To Digg Or Not To Digg

Before the sounds of music permeated Austin’s air this year during the annual South By Southwest festival, SXSW Interactive attracted tech junkies from around the world. One of the many companies represented was Digg.com, a news aggregate site where users submit stories that can be voted up the site by other users by ‘dig’ing them. Do you dig it?
After the speakers silenced and the dust settled, Digg.com CEO Jay Adelson sat down with NPR this past Sunday to discuss the site’s goal – “the social curation of the world’s content and the conversation around it” – and crowd sourcing, a practice Digg recently implemented with their Dialogg site. In Adelson’s own words, crowd sourcing is: ”you’ll see them all over the Internet, these little buttons next to articles. You know, you’ll see them on Web sites like The New York Times or, you know, NPR or elsewhere. And if you click that button, you’re basically sending a signal to Digg that you care about that topic. It doesn’t necessarily mean you agree with the content. It’s just a signal. And we collect it all using crowd wisdom and we put some magic behind that and some algorithms and math and then we bubble up to the surface the stuff that’s interesting.”
The question for PR professionals, then, is this: do we ‘dig’ client news? Full disclosure is necessary with any form of social media, but the issue lies in that Digg does not currently allow you to leave your name/organization on each individual dig. Then again, maybe us PR pros shouldn’t blur the line and should stay away from the site altogether. What’s your opinion?





I don’t think that Digg(ing) a website is an underhanded PR move. By pressing that button you are not endorsing, agreeing, or falsifying anything. You are simply promoting its visibility.
What I think is more important in terms of Digg.com and PR clients is what is being digged and said out there. By honing into current trends, (even pop culture ones), you can better place PR material and respond to positive or negative activity in the field.